MOT POLL Ballots Listings

General Subject: Constitution

Supreme Court & O-Care 1

Ballot creation date: 06/20/2012

Facts


Fact: The US Supreme court is required to judge the Constitutionality of proposed laws that are presented to them. Fact: The Obama Care law was presented with a mandate for payment of monies by those who elected not to participate in the program presented in the law. Fact: The presenters of the proposed law stipulated that the mandate for payment was not a tax. Fact: The Supreme Court did not have the authority to tax, a power reserved for the Legislative branch of the US Government. Fact: The Supreme Court also did not have the authority under the Commerce Clause to force people to buy something they didn't want. However, they could mandate a fee for something received. Fact: Therefore, the Supreme Court judged that a fee mandated for something not received was not a tax, but a fee for nothing received, which was in accordance with not passing a tax law that they were not allowed to do, even though it was a tax for nothing in return to the taxpayer.

Reader agrees with most or all of the Facts (Optional)

Analysis and Conclusion relative to theft:


The last Fact above would normally put this Ballot weight in the realm of insanity. Translated it means, ‘You, the people, give the government money for you not buying what the Government wants you to accept as what the government thinks is affordable health care for you. This desire by the government is enforceable by their grabbing part of your wages, or putting you in jail.’ The Supreme Court was presented a mandate law that they did not have the authority to pass when saying that the mandate was a tax. Therefore they said that since they couldn't make a judgment on taxation, they would judge it as a tax anyway because it was presented as a mandate. Since they admitted that it was a tax, the option existed to do a spell-check-and-replace on all the 'mandate' words with the word, 'tax', and thereby have the case excluded from a hearing at all. They did not do this, and the later-called Affordable Care Act became the general health care law of the land. Therefore the Supreme Court judged the constitutionality of a highly unpopular law under the self-assumed right of determining the meaning of words. And thereby they changed the applications of  English Dictionary language words like ‘mandate’ and ‘tax’, and used their invented meanings to shove the ‘Constitutionality’ of a law down everyone’s throat who abides by the law. The ‘Liberals’ on the Supreme court used different meanings of key words and then, while ignoring accepted American meanings of these words, pronounced their determination of a law, using their ‘new word meanings’ to be in accordance with the US Constitution. This MOT Ballot weighs the theft by the Supreme Court of their salary from the people by not doing their job in compliance with the Constitution which has no provision for allowing them to change the meaning of words for any reason concerning judgments.

Reader agrees with most or all of the Analysis and Conclusions (Optional)

Enter your weight of feeling and send
 
Check one

Average weight of all feelings on this Ballot